monthly column from lifestyle author/activist
A councilman from a small Connecticut town was on the radio the other day talking about his attempts to pass a new law that would require anyone
Now along with wondering why this gentleman should be spending virtually all his waking life worrying about sex (me thinks he doth protest too much) I wonder exactly what dangers he feels the sex act might pose? Especially in light of a recent study conducted in Great Britain. Researchers following a sample of 1000 men found that those who reported having sexual relations at least twice a week were more than half as likely to be alive after 10 years as those who reported having sex less than once a month. Curiously, when people like the councilman rant on about the dangers of sex, they seem to have no inkling of the many benefits it provides, such as extending one's life span.
And from Arizona, Dave Hutchison of Liberated Christians reports that councilmen in Phoenix are doing their best to protect everyone in that city from sex by passing a law that will make swing clubs illegal and the only way to reverse such a blatant violation of the First Amendment will be through a voter's initiative requiring 50,000 signatures. Clearly, the cost of fighting city hall - when they already have all your money - is prohibitive.
Dave also tells of how such moves to protect us from sex can devastate the personal lives of people just like you. A woman in Memphis who was part of a triad had her 3 year old daughter taken into protective custody when she, the mother, appeared on MTV to take part in a discussion of alternative lifestyles. Please note that there were no charges other than that of the woman's commitment to polyandry. If you want to know more about the shocking erosion of rights you though you had, visit Dave's web site at www.libchrist.com.
And a hot controversy is now taking place regarding an all girl's night out that included a male stripper. What makes this event unique is that it was an all high school girl's night out. Despite the fact that national surveys show the majority of this population to have been sexually active for years, there was still much tearing of hair and gnashing of teeth on the part of those typically upset by such things; clearly believing that ignorance is bliss in the nation that now leads the civilized world in unwanted teen pregnancies. In fact, the number recently dropped to its lowest point in 20 years (something just under one million) due primarily to Depo-Provera, an injectable contraceptive that lasts several months, but there is hot controversy here too. It can, after all, take adults (who have clearly been doing a less than stellar job) out of the supervisory loop. Anyway, the school and the mothers who were chaperones and the male stripper and anyone else who happened to be handy are all being sued, prosecuted and otherwise beaten about the head. If burning at the stake were still legal there would, no doubt, be those rushing in with flaming faggots.
My pretty and witty friend, Dr. Susan Block, has a very interesting view of why so many people seem to have an overwhelming fear of sex despite its rarely threatening and frequently beneficial effects. Fear and sex, she says, have shared an intertwined evolutionary history. When our very early ancestors gave themselves over to absolute pleasure, there was always the risk that some truly fearsome predators might just happen upon the copulating couple while they were locked in ecstasy and oblivious to any danger.
Indeed, Dr. Suzy continues, fear has become so tightly bound to sex that one is almost always associated with the other. Fear, it seems, can even be an aphrodisiac. This is why sex in a new place, in a new way, with a new partner is so exciting; there's that fear of the unknown. It may also explain the fascination some women have with dangerous men and why some men are drawn to hazardous occupations and dangerous sports. For more on this line of reasoning, you might want to visit www.drsusanblock.com.
Personally, I think there is a significant insight to be had from all of the preceding tales of scary sex. Simply put, the people with the least experience are generally those who are most fearful of sex. And why should this not be so? Any phobia is bound to persist so long as the effected individual avoids that which terrifies. Progressive desensitization cannot occur so long as education and experience are denied. So unless those scared of sex are seen not as more moral but as less healthy and until human sexuality is seen in a mature and positive light, the patients will continue to run the institution.